↓ Skip to main content

Relating Wikipedia article quality to edit behavior and link structure

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Network Science, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Relating Wikipedia article quality to edit behavior and link structure
Published in
Applied Network Science, September 2020
DOI 10.1007/s41109-020-00305-y
Authors

Thorsten Ruprechter, Tiago Santos, Denis Helic

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 17%
Professor 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 17%
Physics and Astronomy 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#19,255,644
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Applied Network Science
#411
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,471
of 406,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Network Science
#31
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.