See below why we shouldn't be doing 'statistical significance' tests on climate change signals. How important are the test results to the end user? Focus should be on reducing the huge GCM spread via model improvement. #ClimateChange https://t.co/m9FpDDWAb
Testing ensembles of climate change scenarios for “statistical significance” http://t.co/lm8RvGU0 #climatechange #globalwarming
Testing ensembles of climate change scenarios for “statistical significance” #climatechange #globalwarming http://t.co/c8F7DFzC
RT @GarethSJones1: Came across thought provoking paper on statistical significance and climate model ensembles http://t.co/wPvWuo5I #usefulreviewercomments
RT @GarethSJones1: Came across thought provoking paper on statistical significance and climate model ensembles http://t.co/wPvWuo5I #usefulreviewercomments
Came across thought provoking paper on statistical significance and climate model ensembles http://t.co/wPvWuo5I #usefulreviewercomments
Anyway, Zwiers and von Storch identify the *single case* where a significance test is appropriate in climate modelling.http://t.co/xpT2QBYg
Testing ensembles of climate change scenarios for statistical significance http://t.co/xpT2QBYg
Testing ensembles of climate change scenarios for statistical significance http://t.co/xpT2QBYg
Anyway, Zwiers and von Storch identify the *single case* where a significance test is appropriate in climate modelling.http://t.co/xpT2QBYg
Or "hypothesis testing: don't do it kids" http://t.co/xpT2QBYg
Testing ensembles of climate change scenarios for statistical significance http://t.co/xpT2QBYg