↓ Skip to main content

Human Fires and Wildfires on Sydney Sandstones: History Informs Management

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Ecology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Human Fires and Wildfires on Sydney Sandstones: History Informs Management
Published in
Fire Ecology, December 2013
DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0903008
Authors

Vic Jurskis, Roger Underwood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#16,853,559
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#194
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,838
of 319,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them