Title |
Key components of data publishing: using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal on Digital Libraries, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00799-016-0178-2 |
Authors |
Claire C. Austin, Theodora Bloom, Sünje Dallmeier-Tiessen, Varsha K. Khodiyar, Fiona Murphy, Amy Nurnberger, Lisa Raymond, Martina Stockhause, Jonathan Tedds, Mary Vardigan, Angus Whyte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 19% |
United States | 3 | 14% |
Netherlands | 2 | 10% |
Thailand | 1 | 5% |
Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 19% |
Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 106 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Librarian | 26 | 24% |
Other | 17 | 15% |
Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
Researcher | 10 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 16% |
Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 25 | 23% |
Computer Science | 22 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 20% |
Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,038,994
of 24,901,761 outputs
Outputs from International Journal on Digital Libraries
#5
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,052
of 361,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal on Digital Libraries
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,901,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.