↓ Skip to main content

Key components of data publishing: using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal on Digital Libraries, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 193)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Key components of data publishing: using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing
Published in
International Journal on Digital Libraries, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00799-016-0178-2
Authors

Claire C. Austin, Theodora Bloom, Sünje Dallmeier-Tiessen, Varsha K. Khodiyar, Fiona Murphy, Amy Nurnberger, Lisa Raymond, Martina Stockhause, Jonathan Tedds, Mary Vardigan, Angus Whyte

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Finland 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 67 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 18 25%
Other 12 17%
Student > Master 12 17%
Researcher 7 10%
Unspecified 6 8%
Other 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 17 24%
Social Sciences 16 22%
Unspecified 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Other 18 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#401,739
of 13,577,074 outputs
Outputs from International Journal on Digital Libraries
#3
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,993
of 262,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal on Digital Libraries
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,577,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them