↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of the rheological structure of Mars

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of the rheological structure of Mars
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40623-016-0593-z
Authors

Shintaro Azuma, Ikuo Katayama

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 50%
Engineering 2 9%
Materials Science 1 5%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#1,259
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,937
of 422,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.