↓ Skip to main content

An analysis of IV tubing in an intensive care unit. is there room for improvement?

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
An analysis of IV tubing in an intensive care unit. is there room for improvement?
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/2197-425x-3-s1-a555
Pubmed ID
Authors

F Doesburg, W Dieperink, MWN Nijsten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#20,334,427
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#365
of 448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,655
of 274,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#66
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.