↓ Skip to main content

Using machine learning to predict links and improve Steiner tree solutions to team formation problems - a cross company study

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Network Science, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Using machine learning to predict links and improve Steiner tree solutions to team formation problems - a cross company study
Published in
Applied Network Science, August 2020
DOI 10.1007/s41109-020-00306-x
Authors

Peter Keane, Faisal Ghaffar, David Malone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Computer Science 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,624,448
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Applied Network Science
#373
of 512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,473
of 399,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Network Science
#29
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.