RT @pwlot: @filippie509 @ylecun Yes. And they should focus on @animalcog. See, for example: https://t.co/Uy7yW1PIAm "Inferential reasoning…
RT @pwlot: For example, please see: https://t.co/Uy7yW1PIAm "Inferential reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans"
For example, please see: https://t.co/Uy7yW1PIAm "Inferential reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans"
@filippie509 @ylecun Yes. And they should focus on @animalcog. See, for example: https://t.co/Uy7yW1PIAm "Inferential reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans"
one of the many ways in which symbol-free methods have not yet reached dog-level cognition:
@davidchalmers42 @TonyZador @ylecun @GaryMarcus @raphaelmilliere @ak_panda @bleepbeepbzzz @MetaAI @noema @Jake_Browning00 @NoemaMag @luislamb @AvilaGarcez Dogs can even reason by exclusion. If a dog knows the name of a 10 toys and is asked to grab one out
@MekuCube Inferential reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans. https://t.co/1YMrP9wFrN