RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @joemcken: @travis_view @jaredlholt One for all those who claim the media’s reporting on myths and conspiracy theories like QAnon someho…
@travis_view @jaredlholt One for all those who claim the media’s reporting on myths and conspiracy theories like QAnon somehow amplifies them and gets more people to believe them.
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber. http…
Gut zu wissen! Das ist extrem wichtig für die #Wisskomm!
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
As with so many things in #scicomm, a lot of your success in correcting misinformation depends on how you do it - things like tone are important - and also who is doing it.
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
Interesting info here running counter to prevailing policy on issuing corrections.
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @callin_bull: The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproduc…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
The *backfire effect* hypothesis proposes that mentioning misinformation in the process of correcting can be counterproductive, because the misinformation—not the correction—is what sticks. A new study* provides further evidence against the backfire effec
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
RT @brooklynmarie: Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone…
Told you. Hold that shit up to the light. Scrutiny and criticism aren't the same as platforming and the sooner everyone re-learns that, the better.
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber. http…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber. http…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber. http…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber. http…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber. http…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber. http…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber. http…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber. http…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber. http…
RT @travis_view: Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
Good news: there is some evidence to suggest that misinformation reporters aren't inadvertently making people dumber.
Good to know
@QanonAnonymous
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar…
Results suggest that "it is safe to repeat misinformation when correcting it, even when the audience might be unfamiliar with the misinformation." https://t.co/DolMvOdF7t https://t.co/Vy0RdAdlOa
RT @UlliEcker: Happy to share an #OpenAccess paper out today in @Psychonomic_Soc #CRPI that provides evidence against familiarity backfire.…
RT @UlliEcker: Happy to share an #OpenAccess paper out today in @Psychonomic_Soc #CRPI that provides evidence against familiarity backfire.…
RT @PhilippMSchmid: Very important study on elusive familiarity backfire: study suggests it is safe to repeat misinfo in debunking even if…
RT @PhilippMSchmid: Very important study on elusive familiarity backfire: study suggests it is safe to repeat misinfo in debunking even if…
Very useful. @STWorg what say you? A reviewer criticized a grant proposal of mine for training physicians to mirror patient concerns
Very important study on elusive familiarity backfire: study suggests it is safe to repeat misinfo in debunking even if audience is unfamiliar with myth.
RT @UlliEcker: Happy to share an #OpenAccess paper out today in @Psychonomic_Soc #CRPI that provides evidence against familiarity backfire.…
RT @UlliEcker: Happy to share an #OpenAccess paper out today in @Psychonomic_Soc #CRPI that provides evidence against familiarity backfire.…
RT @UlliEcker: Happy to share an #OpenAccess paper out today in @Psychonomic_Soc #CRPI that provides evidence against familiarity backfire.…
RT @UlliEcker: Happy to share an #OpenAccess paper out today in @Psychonomic_Soc #CRPI that provides evidence against familiarity backfire.…