↓ Skip to main content

Typhoon-induced precipitation characterization over northern Japan: a case study for typhoons in 2016

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Typhoon-induced precipitation characterization over northern Japan: a case study for typhoons in 2016
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40645-020-00347-x
Authors

Sridhara Nayak, Tetsuya Takemi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2020.
All research outputs
#13,691,548
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#238
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,734
of 398,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.