↓ Skip to main content

Alien Hand Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 995)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Alien Hand Syndrome
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11910-016-0676-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anhar Hassan, Keith A. Josephs

Abstract

Alien hand syndrome (AHS) is a rare disorder of involuntary limb movement together with a sense of loss of limb ownership. It most commonly affects the hand, but can occur in the leg. The anterior (frontal, callosal) and posterior variants are recognized, with distinguishing clinical features and anatomical lesions. Initial descriptions were attributed to stroke and neurosurgical operations, but neurodegenerative causes are now recognized as most common. Structural and functional imaging and clinical studies have implicated the supplementary motor area, pre-supplementary motor area, and their network connections in the frontal variant of AHS, and the inferior parietal lobule and connections in the posterior variant. Several theories are proposed to explain the pathophysiology. Herein, we review the literature to update advances in the understanding of the classification, pathophysiology, etiology, and treatment of AHS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 31%
Neuroscience 25 23%
Psychology 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#339,012
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#12
of 995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,751
of 369,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.