| Title |
A review of analytical methods for assessing preservation in waterlogged archaeological wood and their application in practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heritage Science, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40494-020-00422-y |
| Authors |
Kirsty E. High, Kirsty E. H. Penkman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 45% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Ireland | 1 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 11 | 20% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,773,803
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#138
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,175
of 397,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.