| Title |
Radiomics in medical imaging—“how-to” guide and critical reflection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-020-00887-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janita E. van Timmeren, Davide Cester, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang, Hatem Alkadhi, Bettina Baessler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| Germany | 5 | 9% |
| Austria | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 3 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 43% |
| Scientists | 16 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 960 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 960 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 115 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 111 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 78 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 6% |
| Other | 143 | 15% |
| Unknown | 403 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 195 | 20% |
| Engineering | 75 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 66 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 42 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 3% |
| Other | 112 | 12% |
| Unknown | 444 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#564,847
of 25,877,363 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#12
of 1,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,793
of 427,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,877,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.