↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of tropospheric ozone reanalyses with independent ozonesonde observations in East Asia

Overview of attention for article published in Geoscience Letters, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of tropospheric ozone reanalyses with independent ozonesonde observations in East Asia
Published in
Geoscience Letters, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40562-020-00161-9
Authors

Sunmin Park, Seok-Woo Son, Myung-Il Jung, Jinkyung Park, Sang Seo Park

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 55%
Environmental Science 5 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#18,076,777
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Geoscience Letters
#118
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,480
of 398,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscience Letters
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.