Title |
JIRAM, the Jovian Infrared Auroral Mapper
|
---|---|
Published in |
Space Science Reviews, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11214-014-0094-y |
Authors |
Alberto Adriani, Gianrico Filacchione, Tatiana Di Iorio, Diego Turrini, Raffaella Noschese, Andrea Cicchetti, Davide Grassi, Alessandro Mura, Giuseppe Sindoni, Massimo Zambelli, Giuseppe Piccioni, Maria T. Capria, Federico Tosi, Roberto Orosei, Bianca M. Dinelli, Maria L. Moriconi, Elio Roncon, Jonathan I. Lunine, Heidi N. Becker, Alessadro Bini, Alessandra Barbis, Luciano Calamai, Claudio Pasqui, Stefano Nencioni, Maurizio Rossi, Marco Lastri, Roberto Formaro, Angelo Olivieri |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
Professor | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 17 | 37% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 15% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#968,128
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#45
of 1,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,491
of 253,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.