| Title |
P-SILI is not justification for intubation of COVID-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00724-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin J. Tobin, Franco Laghi, Amal Jubran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5 | 33% |
| Unknown | 10 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 24% |
| Unknown | 29 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,973,481
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#362
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,925
of 400,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#18
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.