↓ Skip to main content

Trend of monthly temperature and daily extreme temperature during 1951–2012 in New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical & Applied Climatology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Trend of monthly temperature and daily extreme temperature during 1951–2012 in New Zealand
Published in
Theoretical & Applied Climatology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00704-016-1764-3
Authors

Tommaso Caloiero

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 14 61%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 14 61%
Environmental Science 5 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,810,904
of 12,228,342 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical & Applied Climatology
#360
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,418
of 275,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical & Applied Climatology
#13
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,228,342 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.