Title |
Intensity–area–duration analysis of droughts in China 1960–2013
|
---|---|
Published in |
Climate Dynamics, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00382-016-3066-y |
Authors |
Jianqing Zhai, Jinlong Huang, Buda Su, Lige Cao, Yanjun Wang, Tong Jiang, Thomas Fischer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 21% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 25 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 11% |
Engineering | 6 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2016.
All research outputs
#5,904,928
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#1,775
of 4,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,115
of 300,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#32
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.