↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and associated factors of developing venous thromboembolism in the perioperative period

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 165)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Prevalence and associated factors of developing venous thromboembolism in the perioperative period
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/2197-425x-3-s1-a231
Pubmed ID
Authors

K Okada, N Saito, H Matsumoto, C Kim, N Hato

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,474,474
of 7,896,890 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#45
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,609
of 267,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,896,890 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.