↓ Skip to main content

Tips and tricks for building a good paper: what editors want

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 196)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Tips and tricks for building a good paper: what editors want
Published in
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40634-020-00273-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon Karlsson, Bruce Reider, Edward M. Wojtys, Stefano Zaffagnini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Engineering 9 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Other 18 27%
Unknown 12 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,557,250
of 18,907,259 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#12
of 196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,948
of 306,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,907,259 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them