@fabio_marson @actpredictlab @SergioTorresM71 Definitely it's too polarized! I think vague terminology is much too blame for this polarization. Stating that X is "grounded" or "embodied" vastly underspecifies the underlying cognitive mechanisms, as nicely
5,975 followers
739 followers
@neuranna + shameless self promotion of my theoretical review on methods in the cognitive neuroscience of concepts only if interested https://t.co/WbaSkZeRTn
739 followers
@criticalneuro @marliekevk @ChrisBaldassano @megschlichting @CharanRanganath Organization of sem memory asks, what goes where and why? I think differences relate to computational processes, though ideas are speculative--but data exist. Review by Bi in Cogn
2,730 followers
RT @MagicTony: 'Grounding' has no currency in the current research landscape, and thus, neither does...embodiment. https://t.co/sZT5P4obZ3…
813 followers
For a cognitive neuroscience of concepts: Moving beyond the grounding issue | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review https://t.co/7ohfvv2gZO