↓ Skip to main content

Breaking out of the echo chamber: missed opportunities for genetics at conservation conferences

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity & Conservation, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Breaking out of the echo chamber: missed opportunities for genetics at conservation conferences
Published in
Biodiversity & Conservation, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10531-016-1159-x
Authors

Helen R. Taylor, Kylie Soanes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 4%
Australia 1 4%
Finland 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Argentina 1 4%
Unknown 22 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Unspecified 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 70%
Unspecified 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Environmental Science 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2017.
All research outputs
#574,920
of 12,340,632 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity & Conservation
#63
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,615
of 274,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity & Conservation
#3
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,340,632 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.