↓ Skip to main content

Breaking out of the echo chamber: missed opportunities for genetics at conservation conferences

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Breaking out of the echo chamber: missed opportunities for genetics at conservation conferences
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10531-016-1159-x
Authors

Helen R. Taylor, Kylie Soanes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Finland 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,734,728
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#243
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,403
of 349,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#6
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.