↓ Skip to main content

How toxic are gold nanoparticles? The state-of-the-art

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Research, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
How toxic are gold nanoparticles? The state-of-the-art
Published in
Nano Research, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12274-014-0697-3
Authors

Ilaria Fratoddi, Iole Venditti, Cesare Cametti, Maria Vittoria Russo

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 219 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 29%
Student > Master 38 17%
Researcher 38 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Unspecified 19 8%
Other 45 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 49 22%
Unspecified 36 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 10%
Physics and Astronomy 17 8%
Other 67 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,845,749
of 13,040,367 outputs
Outputs from Nano Research
#107
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,496
of 264,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Research
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,040,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.