↓ Skip to main content

How toxic are gold nanoparticles? The state-of-the-art

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Research, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
Title
How toxic are gold nanoparticles? The state-of-the-art
Published in
Nano Research, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12274-014-0697-3
Authors

Ilaria Fratoddi, Iole Venditti, Cesare Cametti, Maria Vittoria Russo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 362 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 23%
Student > Master 57 15%
Researcher 54 15%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 72 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 65 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 9%
Materials Science 22 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 6%
Other 94 26%
Unknown 94 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,734,518
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from Nano Research
#376
of 3,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,373
of 260,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Research
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.