↓ Skip to main content

Classification of geothermal systems in Madagascar

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Classification of geothermal systems in Madagascar
Published in
Geothermal Energy, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40517-020-00176-7
Authors

M. Rajaobelison, J. Raymond, M. Malo, C. Dezayes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 44%
Engineering 4 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,198,884
of 18,455,180 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#62
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,242
of 304,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,455,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them