↓ Skip to main content

Classification of geothermal systems in Madagascar

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Classification of geothermal systems in Madagascar
Published in
Geothermal Energy, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40517-020-00176-7
Authors

M. Rajaobelison, J. Raymond, M. Malo, C. Dezayes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 16 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 25%
Engineering 5 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#18,072,774
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#84
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,023
of 398,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.