↓ Skip to main content

In situ growth rates of deep-water octocorals determined from 3D photogrammetric reconstructions

Overview of attention for article published in Coral Reefs, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
In situ growth rates of deep-water octocorals determined from 3D photogrammetric reconstructions
Published in
Coral Reefs, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00338-016-1471-7
Authors

Swaantje Bennecke, Tom Kwasnitschka, Anna Metaxas, Wolf-Christian Dullo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Researcher 10 24%
Unspecified 7 17%
Student > Master 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 31%
Environmental Science 11 26%
Unspecified 10 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 12%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2016.
All research outputs
#9,770,380
of 12,226,820 outputs
Outputs from Coral Reefs
#888
of 1,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,958
of 275,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Coral Reefs
#36
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,226,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.