↓ Skip to main content

The NORMAN Association and the European Partnership for Chemicals Risk Assessment (PARC): let’s cooperate!

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Sciences Europe, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
The NORMAN Association and the European Partnership for Chemicals Risk Assessment (PARC): let’s cooperate!
Published in
Environmental Sciences Europe, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12302-020-00375-w
Authors

Valeria Dulio, Jan Koschorreck, Bert van Bavel, Paul van den Brink, Juliane Hollender, John Munthe, Martin Schlabach, Reza Aalizadeh, Marlene Agerstrand, Lutz Ahrens, Ian Allan, Nikiforos Alygizakis, Damia’ Barcelo’, Pernilla Bohlin-Nizzetto, Susanne Boutroup, Werner Brack, Adèle Bressy, Jan H. Christensen, Lubos Cirka, Adrian Covaci, Anja Derksen, Geneviève Deviller, Milou M. L. Dingemans, Magnus Engwall, Despo Fatta-Kassinos, Pablo Gago-Ferrero, Félix Hernández, Dorte Herzke, Klára Hilscherová, Henner Hollert, Marion Junghans, Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern, Steffen Keiter, Stefan A. E. Kools, Anneli Kruve, Dimitra Lambropoulou, Marja Lamoree, Pim Leonards, Benjamin Lopez, Miren López de Alda, Lian Lundy, Jarmila Makovinská, Ionan Marigómez, Jonathan W. Martin, Brendan McHugh, Cécile Miège, Simon O’Toole, Noora Perkola, Stefano Polesello, Leo Posthuma, Sara Rodriguez-Mozaz, Ivo Roessink, Pawel Rostkowski, Heinz Ruedel, Saer Samanipour, Tobias Schulze, Emma L. Schymanski, Manfred Sengl, Peter Tarábek, Dorien Ten Hulscher, Nikolaos Thomaidis, Anne Togola, Sara Valsecchi, Stefan van Leeuwen, Peter von der Ohe, Katrin Vorkamp, Branislav Vrana, Jaroslav Slobodnik

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 23%
Chemistry 11 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 20 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,056,926
of 20,243,075 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#55
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,158
of 309,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,243,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them