| Title |
The NORMAN Association and the European Partnership for Chemicals Risk Assessment (PARC): let’s cooperate!
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Sciences Europe, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12302-020-00375-w |
| Authors |
Valeria Dulio, Jan Koschorreck, Bert van Bavel, Paul van den Brink, Juliane Hollender, John Munthe, Martin Schlabach, Reza Aalizadeh, Marlene Agerstrand, Lutz Ahrens, Ian Allan, Nikiforos Alygizakis, Damia’ Barcelo’, Pernilla Bohlin-Nizzetto, Susanne Boutroup, Werner Brack, Adèle Bressy, Jan H. Christensen, Lubos Cirka, Adrian Covaci, Anja Derksen, Geneviève Deviller, Milou M. L. Dingemans, Magnus Engwall, Despo Fatta-Kassinos, Pablo Gago-Ferrero, Félix Hernández, Dorte Herzke, Klára Hilscherová, Henner Hollert, Marion Junghans, Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern, Steffen Keiter, Stefan A. E. Kools, Anneli Kruve, Dimitra Lambropoulou, Marja Lamoree, Pim Leonards, Benjamin Lopez, Miren López de Alda, Lian Lundy, Jarmila Makovinská, Ionan Marigómez, Jonathan W. Martin, Brendan McHugh, Cécile Miège, Simon O’Toole, Noora Perkola, Stefano Polesello, Leo Posthuma, Sara Rodriguez-Mozaz, Ivo Roessink, Pawel Rostkowski, Heinz Ruedel, Saer Samanipour, Tobias Schulze, Emma L. Schymanski, Manfred Sengl, Peter Tarábek, Dorien Ten Hulscher, Nikolaos Thomaidis, Anne Togola, Sara Valsecchi, Stefan van Leeuwen, Peter von der Ohe, Katrin Vorkamp, Branislav Vrana, Jaroslav Slobodnik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 6 | 17% |
| Germany | 3 | 9% |
| Belgium | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 51% |
| Scientists | 16 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 23 | 26% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,556,065
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#87
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,199
of 432,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.