↓ Skip to main content

Production of aqueous spherical gold nanoparticles using conventional ultrasonic bath

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Production of aqueous spherical gold nanoparticles using conventional ultrasonic bath
Published in
Discover Nano, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1556-276x-7-420
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji-Hwan Lee, Stephen U S Choi, Seok Pil Jang, Seoung Youn Lee

Abstract

A conventional ultrasonic bath was used to examine the feasibility of forming aqueous spherical gold nanoparticles (GNPs) under atmospheric conditions. The effects of ultrasonic energy on the size and morphology of GNPs were also investigated. Highly monodispersed spherical GNPs were successfully synthesised by sodium citrate reduction in a conventional ultrasonic bath, without an additional heater or magnetic stirrer, as evidenced by ultraviolet-visible spectra and transmission electron microscopy. Ultrasonic energy was shown to be a key parameter for producing spherical GNPs of tunable sizes (20 to 50 nm). A proposed scheme for understanding the role of ultrasonic energy in the formation and growth of GNPs was discussed. The simple single-step method using just a conventional ultrasonic bath as demonstrated in this study offers new opportunities in the production of aqueous suspensions of monodispersed spherical GNPs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 21%
Student > Master 29 20%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 42 29%
Engineering 20 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Materials Science 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 34 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2018.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#522
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,410
of 179,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#13
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.