Title |
Advanced organ support (ADVOS) in the critically ill: first clinical experience in patients with multiple organ failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00714-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Valentin Fuhrmann, Theresa Weber, Kevin Roedl, Jasmin Motaabbed, Adel Tariparast, Dominik Jarczak, Aritz Perez Ruiz de Garibay, Johannes Kluwe, Olaf Boenisch, Harald Herkner, John A. Kellum, Stefan Kluge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 36% |
Sweden | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Malaysia | 1 | 9% |
India | 1 | 9% |
Mexico | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,946,341
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#239
of 1,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,707
of 395,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.