↓ Skip to main content

FDG PET versus CT radiomics to predict outcome in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Research, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 568)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
FDG PET versus CT radiomics to predict outcome in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients
Published in
EJNMMI Research, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13550-020-00669-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Pavic, M. Bogowicz, J. Kraft, D. Vuong, M. Mayinger, S. G. C. Kroeze, M. Friess, T. Frauenfelder, N. Andratschke, M. Huellner, W. Weder, M. Guckenberger, S. Tanadini-Lang, I. Opitz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,926,695
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#22
of 568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,433
of 397,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 568 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.