| Title |
Genetically modified crops safety assessments: present limits and possible improvements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Sciences Europe, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2190-4715-23-10 |
| Authors |
Gilles-Eric Séralini, Robin Mesnage, Emilie Clair, Steeve Gress, Joël Spiroux de Vendômois, Dominique Cellier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 21 | 23% |
| United States | 15 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Kuwait | 2 | 2% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 86 | 95% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 18% |
| Researcher | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#198,678
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#10
of 618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#601
of 120,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them