↓ Skip to main content

Spinal anesthesia in a patient with Schwartz–Jampel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in JA Clinical Reports, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Spinal anesthesia in a patient with Schwartz–Jampel syndrome
Published in
JA Clinical Reports, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40981-020-00357-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Osama Shaalan, Mahmoud Daoud, Ashraf EL-Molla, Rashed Al-Otaibi, Abdulaleem Alatassi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 27%
Researcher 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Unknown 7 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,616,469
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from JA Clinical Reports
#71
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,698
of 396,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JA Clinical Reports
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.