↓ Skip to main content

Formal definition of a user-adaptive and length-optimal routing graph for complex indoor environments

Overview of attention for article published in Geo-Spatial Information Science, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Formal definition of a user-adaptive and length-optimal routing graph for complex indoor environments
Published in
Geo-Spatial Information Science, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11806-011-0474-3
Authors

Marcus Goetz, Alexander Zipf

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 36 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 34%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 29%
Computer Science 11 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 22%
Unspecified 4 10%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 3 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,932,682
of 7,866,440 outputs
Outputs from Geo-Spatial Information Science
#1
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,835
of 268,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geo-Spatial Information Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,866,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 61st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them