↓ Skip to main content

Formal definition of a user-adaptive and length-optimal routing graph for complex indoor environments

Overview of attention for article published in Geo-Spatial Information Science, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Formal definition of a user-adaptive and length-optimal routing graph for complex indoor environments
Published in
Geo-Spatial Information Science, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11806-011-0474-3
Authors

Marcus Goetz, Alexander Zipf

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 52 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 32%
Student > Master 16 29%
Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 17 30%
Engineering 13 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 16%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Design 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Geo-Spatial Information Science
#57
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,801
of 190,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geo-Spatial Information Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them