Just a quick reminder for people using the #EQ5D in any of its versions: "EQ-5D" is not an abbreviation and a well-defined nomenclature exists: https://t.co/MPbVXVIZ7u #HealthEconomics #HRQoL
RT @tara_lavelle: I did not know this!! https://t.co/y1OlR1IUUJ
RT @koonalshah: Note to the @PECjournal @ApplHealthEcon editorial teams: The correct and full name of EQ-5D is EQ-5D, not EuroQoL 5-Dimensi…
I've been made to change it to the incorrect version by editorial peeps before now.
Right on Koonal. All we need now is to stop reference to EQ-5D as a "preference-based" measure. It CAN be when used in specific circumstances where a QALY metric is required. However, in non h/economics applications we need the patient voice, so social we
I did not know this!!
RT @koonalshah: Note to the @PECjournal @ApplHealthEcon editorial teams: The correct and full name of EQ-5D is EQ-5D, not EuroQoL 5-Dimensi…
Note to the @PECjournal @ApplHealthEcon editorial teams: The correct and full name of EQ-5D is EQ-5D, not EuroQoL 5-Dimensions as the abstract of this paper implies. @EuroQol recently published an article on nomenclature: https://t.co/TOdNKlqKA6
‘EQ-5D’ is not an abbreviation; it is the correct term to use, as are ‘EQ-5D-3L’, ‘ED-5D-5L’, and ‘EQ-5D-Y’ and they require no further definition. https://t.co/NgDVSPTv6z
How use the correct term of the EQ-5D
RT @EuroQol: In the interests of accuracy and good practice, standardising scientific nomenclature is important. A commentary has now been…
RT @Quality_Outcome: A welcome reminder for users of #EQ-5D. It would have been really useful if this commentary had also pointed out that…
A welcome reminder for users of #EQ-5D. It would have been really useful if this commentary had also pointed out that EQ-5D is NOT a preference-weighted or utility index. It is essentially a descriptive system defining health states that MAY be optionally
Worthwhile noting: "...the @EuroQol would like to emphasise that ‘EQ-5D’ is not an abbreviation and is the correct term to use when referring to the instrument in general." Further detail on correct nomenclature and its history: https://t.co/BoZr8RKYAS #
RT @EuroQol: In the interests of accuracy and good practice, standardising scientific nomenclature is important. A commentary has now been…
RT @EuroQol: In the interests of accuracy and good practice, standardising scientific nomenclature is important. A commentary has now been…
RT @JPRO_ISOQOL: EQ-5D: a plea for accurate nomenclature https://t.co/1fHNWAxPIS
RT @EuroQol: In the interests of accuracy and good practice, standardising scientific nomenclature is important. A commentary has now been…
Academic challenge: using correct terminology for the EQ-5D
In the interests of accuracy and good practice, standardising scientific nomenclature is important. A commentary has now been published about the variety of terms used to describe the EQ-5D and makes a plea to employ the standard EQ-5D nomenclature. #EQ5D
RT @JPRO_ISOQOL: EQ-5D: a plea for accurate nomenclature https://t.co/1fHNWAxPIS
RT @JPRO_ISOQOL: EQ-5D: a plea for accurate nomenclature https://t.co/1fHNWAxPIS
We feel your pain @EuroQol. There is no need to enlarge ICECAP-A, ICECAP-O or ICECAP-SCM either. And that is even before the ICECAP measures for children and young people, that are currently being developed, are available 🙈
Interesting read! Different licence agreements needed for paper, online completion and I most recently learned for telephone interview (due to changes in how we collect information -COVID).. what percentage of research uses this measure...anyone know?
RT @JPRO_ISOQOL: EQ-5D: a plea for accurate nomenclature https://t.co/1fHNWAxPIS
RT @JPRO_ISOQOL: EQ-5D: a plea for accurate nomenclature https://t.co/1fHNWAxPIS
RT @JPRO_ISOQOL: EQ-5D: a plea for accurate nomenclature https://t.co/1fHNWAxPIS
EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-Y are names of the EQ instruments, not abbreviations. Useful clarification by @EuroQol, especially when you are asked to spell out the names by reviewers.
RT @JPRO_ISOQOL: EQ-5D: a plea for accurate nomenclature https://t.co/1fHNWAxPIS
EQ-5D: a plea for accurate nomenclature https://t.co/XTY7iao14W
RT @JPRO_ISOQOL: EQ-5D: a plea for accurate nomenclature https://t.co/1fHNWAxPIS
EQ-5D: a plea for accurate nomenclature https://t.co/1fHNWAxPIS