↓ Skip to main content

Engineering and humanitarian intervention: learning from failure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Humanitarian Action, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 132)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Engineering and humanitarian intervention: learning from failure
Published in
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41018-020-00073-5
Authors

Adeela Arshad-Ayaz, M. Ayaz Naseem, Dania Mohamad

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,471,318
of 24,166,768 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#28
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,251
of 403,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,166,768 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.