↓ Skip to main content

Functional characterization of a defense-related class-III chitinase promoter from Lupinus albus, active in legume and monocot tissues

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Plant Pathology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Functional characterization of a defense-related class-III chitinase promoter from Lupinus albus, active in legume and monocot tissues
Published in
European Journal of Plant Pathology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10658-016-0970-2
Authors

Dean Oelofse, Inge Gazendam, Adri Veale, Arnaud Djami-Tchatchou, Dave Berger, Ian Dubery

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 60%
Professor 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 80%
Unspecified 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,698,122
of 12,319,267 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#314
of 414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,843
of 275,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,319,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.