↓ Skip to main content

Impact of attenuation correction on clinical [18F]FDG brain PET in combined PET/MRI

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Research, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 558)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Impact of attenuation correction on clinical [18F]FDG brain PET in combined PET/MRI
Published in
EJNMMI Research, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13550-016-0200-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Werner, M. Rullmann, A. Bresch, S. Tiepolt, T. Jochimsen, D. Lobsien, M. L. Schroeter, O. Sabri, H. Barthel

Abstract

In PET/MRI, linear photon attenuation coefficients for attenuation correction (AC) cannot be directly derived, and cortical bone is, so far, usually not considered. This results in an underestimation of the average PET signal in PET/MRI. Recently introduced MR-AC methods predicting bone information from anatomic MRI or proton density-weighted zero-time imaging may solve this problem in the future. However, there is an ongoing debate if the current error is acceptable for clinical use and/or research. We examined this feature for [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) brain PET in 13 patients with clinical signs of dementia or movement disorders who subsequently underwent PET/CT and PET/MRI on the same day. Multiple MR-AC approaches including a CT-derived AC were applied. The resulting PET data was compared to the CT-derived standard regarding the quantification error and its clinical impact. On a quantitative level, -11.9 to +2 % deviations from the CT-AC standard were found. These deviations, however, did not translate into a systematic diagnostic error. This, as overall patterns of hypometabolism (which are decisive for clinical diagnostics), remained largely unchanged. Despite a quantitative error by the omission of bone in MR-AC, clinical quality of brain [(18)F]FDG is not relevantly affected. Thus, brain [(18)F]FDG PET can already, even now with suboptimal MR-AC, be utilized for clinical routine purposes, even though the MR-AC warrants improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 45%
Engineering 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,951,310
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#23
of 558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,950
of 339,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 558 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.