↓ Skip to main content

Provider-Initiated HIV Testing and Counseling in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
Provider-Initiated HIV Testing and Counseling in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10461-012-0241-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caitlin E. Kennedy, Virginia A. Fonner, Michael D. Sweat, F. Amolo Okero, Rachel Baggaley, Kevin R. O’Reilly

Abstract

Provider-initiated HIV testing and counseling (PITC) has expanded since 2007 WHO guidelines were established. We conducted a systematic review of PITC in low- and middle-income countries. Peer-reviewed studies were included if they measured pre-post or multi-arm outcomes. Two coders abstracted data using standardized forms. Nineteen studies were included, all from sub-Saharan Africa (N = 15) or Asia (N = 4). Studies were conducted in clinics for antenatal/family planning/child health (N = 12), tuberculosis (N = 4), outpatient (N = 1), sexually transmitted diseases (N = 1), and methadone maintenance (N = 1). HIV testing uptake increased after PITC. Condom use also increased following PITC in most studies; nevirapine uptake and other outcomes were mixed. Few negative outcomes were identified. Findings support PITC as an important intervention to increase HIV testing. PITC's impact on other outcomes is mixed, but does not appear to be worse than voluntary counseling and testing. PITC should continue to be expanded and rigorously evaluated across settings and outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 217 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 22%
Researcher 46 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Other 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 39 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 36%
Social Sciences 33 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 46 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,199,664
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#299
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,917
of 166,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#8
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.