@PhilippeSohm @FlorentRoduit @FLAHAULT (Sources pour le HPV, aka papillomavirus : https://t.co/I3ShSKW6Ju ; https://t.co/d8hLYHQg5a ; https://t.co/bo8tf7QnTU)
@JordanHedberg Research doesn't support your take. It may seem intuitive, but research shows that people who get vaccinated let their guard down post-vaccination. So, this would seem to lend support to the vaccine working. https://t.co/gN4X5Lcn3V
@JasdipSagu @narc_free @wmcconnell91 @ChrisCrosss98 @buttoncupcake @ABCFactCheck …because they’re more likely to take risks and go out. That’s an obvious one. The chance of someone actually contracting the virus is lower, but the chances of them going out
@soydcapricornio Aquí dice que se descuidan: https://t.co/Ut2mg8daJS Y no encuentro nada sobre la vacuna previniendo contagio, solo daños. Voy a seguir investigando.
@JuliaLMarcus @bmj_latest We have found no risk compensation for vaccination. We lay out some conceitualization for when risk compensation is and is not a problem. After all, we do some safety behaviors so we can do dangerous things. https://t.co/kEIpvFD70
RT @noelTbrewer: @SBMPresident Risk compensation is pretty rare. It can be less worrisome when a preventive measure is highly effective. An…
@SBMPresident Risk compensation is pretty rare. It can be less worrisome when a preventive measure is highly effective. And what looks like risk compensation may be due to some other process. https://t.co/gwSfht3bky [Typos corrected]
@SBMPresident Risk compensation is pretty rare and can’t matter less when preventive measure is highly effective. And what looks oks like risk compensation may not be. https://t.co/gwSfht3bky
.@sanjaysoodsmith and the assumption that ppl will become disinhibited due to better HIV prevention may be unfounded https://t.co/vjYJDpQT1R
@EdForChoice Here's a good start http://t.co/0ajZsFTI Key finding is no evidence of disinhibition