The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||41||82%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||8||16%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||13||9%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||12||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||12||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||51||37%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||6||4%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||5||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,065,546 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 403,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,065,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.