↓ Skip to main content

Geometric Generalisations of shake and rattle

Overview of attention for article published in Foundations of Computational Mathematics, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Geometric Generalisations of shake and rattle
Published in
Foundations of Computational Mathematics, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10208-013-9163-y
Authors

Robert I McLachlan, Klas Modin, Olivier Verdier, Matt Wilkins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 45%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 4 36%
Engineering 3 27%
Computer Science 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,161,674
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Foundations of Computational Mathematics
#167
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,879
of 196,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foundations of Computational Mathematics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.