Title |
Interventions to Improve Decision Making and Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Management of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-012-2086-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Saleha Sajid, Ashwin A. Kotwal, William Dale |
Abstract |
Ethnic minorities are disproportionately impacted by prostate cancer (PCa) and are at risk for not receiving informed decision making (IDM). We conducted a systematic literature review on interventions to improve: (1) IDM about PCa in screening-eligible minority men, and (2) quality of life (QOL) in minority PCa survivors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
Researcher | 18 | 15% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Other | 24 | 21% |
Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 24% |
Psychology | 13 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,388,035
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,570
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,193
of 166,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#40
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.