↓ Skip to main content

Anesthetic management of a patient with musculocontractural Ehlers-Danlos syndrome undergoing scoliosis surgery

Overview of attention for article published in JA Clinical Reports, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Anesthetic management of a patient with musculocontractural Ehlers-Danlos syndrome undergoing scoliosis surgery
Published in
JA Clinical Reports, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40981-020-00352-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryo Wakabayashi, Satoshi Tanaka, Keiko Tsuchiyama, Katsumi Yamamoto, Yuki Maruyama, Kaori Numata, Mikito Kawamata

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 25%
Unknown 3 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,328,803
of 17,954,410 outputs
Outputs from JA Clinical Reports
#28
of 60 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,389
of 297,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JA Clinical Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,954,410 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them