↓ Skip to main content

Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41235-020-00226-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillip L. Ackerman, Corey E. Tatel, Sibley F. Lyndgaard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 12%
Engineering 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2020.
All research outputs
#18,728,392
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#290
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,929
of 398,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.