| Title |
A comparison of nasogastric tube insertion by SORT maneuver (sniffing position, NGT orientation, contralateral rotation, and twisting movement) versus neck flexion lateral pressure in critically ill patients admitted to ICU: a prospective randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00696-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarvin Sanaie, Negin Mirzalou, Kamran Shadvar, Samad E. J. Golzari, Hassan Soleimanpour, Ali Shamekh, Deepti Bettampadi, Saeid Safiri, Ata Mahmoodpoor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 7 | 37% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 17% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,653,818
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#189
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,104
of 434,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.