| Title |
Colony-level and season-specific variation in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of individual workers in the ant Formica truncorum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insectes Sociaux, February 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s000400050113 |
| Authors |
J. Nielsen, J. J. Boomsma, N. J. Oldham, H. C. Petersen, E. D. Morgan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 24% |
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 72% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,483,725
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#324
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,798
of 98,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.