↓ Skip to main content

Spatial accuracy assessment of unmanned aerial vehicle-based structures from motion multi-view stereo photogrammetry for geomorphic observations in initiation zones of debris flows, Ohya landslide…

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Spatial accuracy assessment of unmanned aerial vehicle-based structures from motion multi-view stereo photogrammetry for geomorphic observations in initiation zones of debris flows, Ohya landslide, Japan
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40645-020-00336-0
Authors

Haruka Tsunetaka, Norifumi Hotta, Yuichi S. Hayakawa, Fumitoshi Imaizumi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 6 14%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 19%
Engineering 7 17%
Environmental Science 5 12%
Computer Science 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2020.
All research outputs
#12,864,232
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#172
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,325
of 398,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.