↓ Skip to main content

Organizational factors associated with adherence to low tidal volume ventilation: a secondary analysis of the CHECKLIST-ICU database

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Organizational factors associated with adherence to low tidal volume ventilation: a secondary analysis of the CHECKLIST-ICU database
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00687-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thais Dias Midega, Fernando A. Bozza, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Helio Penna Guimarães, Jorge I. Salluh, Antonio Paulo Nassar, Karina Normílio-Silva, Marcus J. Schultz, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Ary Serpa Neto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 8 14%
Other 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Professor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 22 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Unspecified 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2020.
All research outputs
#13,541,585
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#707
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,553
of 399,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#26
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.