↓ Skip to main content

Catalog of small repeating earthquakes for the Japanese Islands

Overview of attention for article published in Earth Planets and Space, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Catalog of small repeating earthquakes for the Japanese Islands
Published in
Earth Planets and Space, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40623-020-01205-2
Authors

Toshihiro Igarashi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 48%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 76%
Engineering 2 7%
Psychology 1 3%
Unknown 4 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,533,496
of 17,838,103 outputs
Outputs from Earth Planets and Space
#117
of 843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,444
of 295,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth Planets and Space
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,838,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 843 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them