↓ Skip to main content

Kostenanalyse zur Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik

Overview of attention for article published in Der Orthopäde, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 439)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Kostenanalyse zur Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik
Published in
Der Orthopäde, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00132-009-1473-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

O. Cerha, S. Kirschner, K.-P. Günther, J. Lützner

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 25%
United Kingdom 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Engineering 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,963,388
of 12,590,431 outputs
Outputs from Der Orthopäde
#9
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,341
of 264,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Der Orthopäde
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,590,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them