↓ Skip to main content

Landslide susceptibility evaluation and hazard zonation techniques – a review

Overview of attention for article published in Geoenvironmental Disasters, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
383 Mendeley
Title
Landslide susceptibility evaluation and hazard zonation techniques – a review
Published in
Geoenvironmental Disasters, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40677-020-00152-0
Authors

Leulalem Shano, Tarun Kumar Raghuvanshi, Matebie Meten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 383 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 10%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 4%
Lecturer 15 4%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 193 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 69 18%
Engineering 52 14%
Environmental Science 32 8%
Computer Science 9 2%
Unspecified 6 2%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 199 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#18,724,612
of 23,208,901 outputs
Outputs from Geoenvironmental Disasters
#85
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,336
of 390,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoenvironmental Disasters
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,208,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.